Ronald A. Cass paints Hamdan as the new
Kelo. That should be hard to do, since
Kelo was about deferring to government and putting a low value on individual rights, and
Hamdan seems to be the opposite. But a lawyer can always say why two things are alike (and also why two things are different). I've read the piece, and all I can see is that the word
Kelo seems to be a cue to stir up anger at the Supreme Court.
No comments:
Post a Comment